Tag: Wisconsin Legislature

Wisconsin’s Lawsuit Climate Ranking Increases Thanks to Tort Reforms Enacted in 2011-12

Wisconsin moved up seven spots, from No. 22 to No. 15, in the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform’s latest lawsuit climate study: 2012 State Liability Systems Survey, Lawsuit Climate: Ranking the States.[1] The survey of over 1100 corporate attorneys and executives focused on a number of criteria, including each state’s overall treatment of tort and contract litigation, treatment of class action lawsuits, damages, and judges’ impartiality.

“Thanks to the significant tort reforms enacted during last session by the Wisconsin Legislature and Gov. Scott Walker, Wisconsin’s litigation climate has improved and the state is a better place to do business,” said Bill G. Smith, President of the Wisconsin Civil Justice Council (WCJC) and Wisconsin Director of the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB).

The first bill introduced was comprehensive tort reform legislation, which eventually became 2011 Wisconsin Act 2. The legislation brought Wisconsin back into the mainstream and overturned a number of negative decisions issued by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 2005-06 term.

During Gov. Walker’s second special session in the fall of 2011, the Legislature enacted three more substantive tort reforms.[2] Continue reading “Wisconsin’s Lawsuit Climate Ranking Increases Thanks to Tort Reforms Enacted in 2011-12”

Another Campaign Ad Falsely Claims Law Protecting Equal Pay for Women Repealed

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – May 17, 2012  

Contact Information — Bill G. Smith — (608) 255-6083/Andrew Cook – (608) 258-9506

Madison – The Greater Wisconsin Political Fund has released an ad targeting
Gov. Scott Walker that falsely alleges that he repealed a law making it “easier for corporations to pay women less money than men.”

Opponents of Senate Bill 202 (2011 Wisconsin Act 219), which repeals punitive and compensatory damages under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, continue to make this claim despite the fact that multiple non-partisan news organizations have rated such statements as “false” and “misleading”:

  • WISC-TV (Channel 3) reporter Jessica Arp labeled a similar ad by Mayor Tom Barrett as “misleading.”

Apparently opponents of Act 219 believe in the theory that if you say something enough times, it eventually becomes true and therefore you win the argument.

For more information about Act 219, visit Wisconsin Civil Justice Council’s website.

###

The Phony “War on Women” Mantra Continues Despite Numerous News Outlets Calling Such Claims False

Opponents of Senate Bill 202 (2011 Wisconsin Act 219), which repeals punitive and compensatory damages under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act, continue to make false claims that the law has taken away women’s right to equal pay and thus is part of an overall “war on women.” Continue reading “The Phony “War on Women” Mantra Continues Despite Numerous News Outlets Calling Such Claims False”

Legislation Repealing Punitive and Compensatory Damages under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act Officially Becomes Law

In a victory for Wisconsin businesses, Gov. Scott Walker signed into law Senate Bill 202, which repeals punitive and compensatory damages under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act.

In 2009, Gov. Jim Doyle signed into law 2009 Wisconsin Act 20, which for the first time imposed punitive and compensatory damages in discrimination cases under the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act. WCJC scored yet another major victory by helping pass Senate Bill 202, which repeals Act 20.

Contrary to claims being made by SB 202’s opponents, this legislation does NOT take away equal pay for women or any other protected class. Once the new law goes into effect, employees alleging workplace discrimination can still sue at the state level and seek the following remedies:

  • Reinstatement;
  • Back  pay up to two years;
  • Attorney fees and reasonable court costs.
  • Moreover, employees can elect to sue in federal court, where they can still seek punitive and compensatory damages.

Senate Bill 202, now 2011 Wis. Act 219, protects Wisconsin businesses from meritless and costly lawsuits by returning the law as it was in 2009.

Bill Providing Immunity to School Boards for Recreational Activities and Immunity for Volunteers Signed into Law

The same day he signed the Ski Hill Liability Protection legislation, Gov. Scott Walker also signed into law 2011 Wis. Act 162, which provides immunity from liability to schools for a death or injury that occurs on school grounds when the death or injury results from a recreational activity held on the school grounds pursuant to a recreational agreement between the school board and an individual.

Specifically, the immunity under AB 497 is provided to school boards, school districts, and governing bodies of charter schools, as well as their officers, employees, and agents.

The term “recreational activity” includes “any indoor or outdoor physical activity, sport, team sport, or game, whether organized or unorganized, undertaken for exercise, relaxation, diversion, or pleasure.” The term “recreational agreement” refers to a “written authorization granted by the school to a person permitting public access to the school grounds for a recreational activity.”

The bill does provide an exception for “malicious acts” or “malicious failure to warn” against an unsafe condition.

The original bill was amended to include language providing immunity for volunteers under Wis. Stat. § 893.80. Under current law, § 893.80 imposes certain requirements and certain limitations on claims and damages in a lawsuit brought against a volunteer fire company, political corporation, governmental subdivision, or any officer, official, agent or employee.

As amended, Act 162 provides that an “agent” under § 893.80 also includes a “volunteer,” which is defined under the bill as a person who:

  • Provides services or performs duties for, and with the express or implied consent of, a volunteer fire company, political corporation, or governmental subdivision or agency thereof;
  • Is subject to the right of control of the volunteer fire company, political corporation, or governmental subdivision or agency thereof; and
  • Is not paid a fee, salary, or other compensation by any person for the services or duties described above, other than reimbursement of expenses.

In addition, the bill provides that the procurement or maintenance of insurance or self-insurance by a volunteer fire company, political corporation, or governmental subdivision or agency, irrespective of the extent or type of coverage or the persons insured, shall not do any of the following:

  • Constitute a waiver of the provisions of § 893.80; or
  • Be relied upon to deny a person status as an officer, official, agent, or employee of the volunteer fire company political corporation, or governmental subdivision or agency that is procuring or maintaining the insurance or self-insurance.

Governor Signs Ski Hill Liability Protection Bill

On Monday, April 2, Gov. Scott Walker signed into law 2011 Wis. Act 199, which expands the “assumption of risk” doctrine to protect ski operators who follow certain safety protocols from lawsuits.

The assumption of risk doctrine provides that when an individual engages in a potentially dangerous activity, that person does so with the knowledge that the activity contains the possibility of injury.

Current law provides that one who has assumed a risk and sustained injury or death from the activity may still recover damages from the responsible party even if the injured party failed to follow prescribed protocols.

Under Act 199, if a ski area operator follows certain safety precautions, the operator will not be responsible for any injuries an individual may suffer while skiing on the operator’s ski hill.

Below are just a few of the duties a ski operator must comply with to obtain liability protection:

  • Provide a notice on the ticket or hill pass that the ski hill operator is not liable for any injuries.
  • Post signs containing warnings reminding participants of the dangers of skiing. Signs must be at least 10 feet inside the area where tickets are sold, and on slopes, tubing areas, trails, and terrains.
  • Provide copies of trail and ski area maps in the ticketing area.

If the ski operator follows these and other requirements, then he or she is not responsible for any injuries sustained by an individual who has assumed the risk of skiing. WCJC supported Act 199.

Legislature Passes Ski Hill Liability Protection Legislation, Sent to Governor’s Desk

This week, the Wisconsin Assembly passed Senate Bill 388, which expands the “assumption of risk” doctrine to protect ski operators who follow certain safety protocols from lawsuits. The bill will now be sent to the Governor for his signature.

The assumption of risk doctrine provides that when an individual engages in a potentially dangerous activity, that person does so with the knowledge that the activity contains the possibility of injury.

Current law provides that one who has assumed a risk and sustained injury or death from the activity may still recover damages from the responsible party even if the injured party failed to follow prescribed protocols.

Under SB 388, if a ski area operator follows certain safety precautions, the operator will not be responsible for any injuries an individual may suffer while skiing on the operator’s ski hill.

Below are just a few of the duties a ski operator must comply with to obtain liability protection:

  • Provide a notice on the ticket or hill pass that the ski hill operator is not liable for any injuries.
  • Post signs containing warnings reminding participants of the dangers of skiing. Signs must be at least 10 feet inside the area where tickets are sold, and on slopes, tubing areas, trails, and terrains.
  • Provide copies of trail and ski area maps in the ticketing area.

If the ski operator follows these and other requirements, then he or she is not responsible for any injuries sustained by an individual who has assumed the risk of skiing. WCJC supported SB 388.